'Effigy of Victoire Auguste Antoinette of Saxe-Coburg-Gotha, Duchesse de Nemours' (1822-1857)Henri Michel Antoine Chapu (Le Mée-sur-Seine, near Paris, 1833 – 1891 Paris)Artwork Details
Carved around the flat edge of the base in a continuous line of text is a Latin inscription which reads in translation:
The tomb effigy of the Duchess of Nemours was originally carved, sometime between August 1881 and 5 October 1883, for the small domed and castellated mausoleum chapel attached to the formerly Roman Catholic church of St. Charles Borromeo, in Weybridge, Surrey2. The church crypt temporarily housed the tombs of the exiled French King Louis-Philippe (died 1850), who was the Duchess of Nemours’ father-in-law, and twelve other members of the French royal family, who died in England between 1856 and 1876. Louis-Philippe and the Orléans family had fled into exile from the Paris revolution of 1848 and had been housed by Queen Victoria on the nearby royal estate of Claremont, near Esher, Surrey. Queen Victoria, despite the political dangers, of which she was warned by her Prime Minister, was very supportive of the exiled King and his family, whom she had first met in France in 1843. This event was celebrated as the first meeting between French and English monarchs since 1520. As well as offering shelter she encouraged courtiers to write letters to 'The Times' sympathising with the plight of “these poor exiles” and often invited the Duchess of Nemours in particular, of whom she was very fond, to stay privately at Osborne House on the Isle of White3. The Orléans family tombs remained in the Weybridge chapel until the French royal family were allowed to return to France in 1876 and all the royal remains, excepting those of the Duchess of Nemours, were removed and re-interred at the royal chapel of the Orléans family at Dreux in Normandy. Her remains stayed at Weybridge until 1979 when her body, but not her tomb effigy, was transferred to Dreux to join that of her husband. In letters to Queen Victoria in 1876 the Duke of Nemours explained that he and his children wished for the Duchess’s body to remain in its ‘modest and respectable retreat’ and was greatly satisfied to hear from the Queen that she shared these feelings, because of her great affection for his family. He turned down, however, the Queen’s offer of arranging to place a commemorative effigy on the bare tomb slab, although he was happy to accept her advice on the matter4. The Duchess was a close and beloved cousin of both Queen Victoria and Prince Albert. She was a childhood playmate of the Prince’s at Rosenau, his German home, and considered by the Queen to be a bosom friend “like a dear sister to us” and called “my beloved Vic”5. As well as sharing first names both the Queen and the younger Duchess had married in the same year, 1840. In 1852 the Queen commissioned the painter Franz Xavier Winterhalter (1805-1873) to portray the namesake cousins holding hands as a birthday present for the Duchess’s other cousin Prince Albert6. Five years later, after the Duchess’s death, the Queen wrote that she had been: “so dear, so good, one of those pure, virtuous unobtrusive characters who make a home peaceful, cheerful and happy”7. Charlotte Canning, the Queen’s Lady-in-Waiting, didn’t share her royal mistress’s enthusiasm, agreeing that though she was very pretty and nice to look at: “besides having a tiresome voice she has nothing to say.8” Her fame was spread further when in 1856 a finely scented double white variety of the Peony flower (Paonia lactiflora ‘Duchesse de Nemours’) was named after her in France9.
When the Duchess died suddenly on 10 November 1857, only ten days after she had given birth to her fourth child, Blanche, both the Queen and her husband were ‘deeply afflicted’ and ‘completely upset’, and rushed to visit the family on the following day. The Queen provided a highly melodramatic account of the death to Lord Clarendon:
Prince Albert wrote equally emotionally to his brother on November 11 and described her as looking “like an angel of beauty, her glorious hair falling over her bosom”. To commemorate her cousin the Queen also compiled an album which included a watercolour of the 'Duchesse de Nemours on her deathbed, after death, 10 November 1857'. This shows her in a similar pose to that adopted by the sculptor Chapu for the tomb effigy11. Chapu would never have seen the Duchess alive as his effigy was carved some 24 years after her sudden death, nor is he known to have visited England. His serene evocation of the youthful but dead princess must have derived from portraits of her. There is some evidence that he was sent a plaster cast of a portrait bust of the Duchess. On 12 June 1880 Princess Beatrice wrote, on behalf of her mother the Queen, to the Duke of Nemours, that: “the cast of the bust of dear Aunt Victoire that you would like to have is ready and Mother will send it to you. She is very happy for you to have it. I will put you in contact with a sculptor for the monument at Weybridge.”12 The bust from which Queen Victoria had a cast made may have been that by Carlo Marochetti (1805-1867), whose portrait bust of the 'Duchess of Nemours' of about 1857 is still in the Royal Collection13. Despite the Duke’s polite rebuff of Queen Victoria’s offer in 1876 to make arrangements for a tomb effigy she had not been easily deterred. On 7 January 1880 she wrote to him asking whether he had yet decided about the monument, and a year later on 4 January 1881 she wanted to know why he hadn’t discussed further with her the monument that she so wanted to have placed at Weybridge14. She monitored the progress of the monument closely, requesting and receiving photographs of the plaster model, presumably the model now in the Musée Chapu, and the finished marble15. The plaster model for the effigy was finished in July 1881 and by 5 October 1883 the finished marble was in place in a specially constructed alcove on the south of the nave of the recently built extension16. Finally on 29 July 1884 the Queen paid a visit to the Weybridge chapel, as recorded in the Court Circular, and a month later expressed herself “greatly satisfied with the monument and all the other arrangements” in the chapel17.
Chapu may also have been helped by descriptions of the Duchess’s body from the Duke as he certainly changed his mind in the course of drawing up his designs for the monument. The Musée Chapu has at least one pen and ink drawing for the commission, showing several sketches for the tomb plinth and three for the figure itself18. The small studies show that one of Chapu’s original ideas for the effigy was to portray the Duchess with her hands crossed over her chest. This was a more traditional pose for a tomb effigy, derived from the sculpture of Medieval and Renaissance France, in which the deceased was depicted lying on the lid of the sarcophagus. However, something or someone prompted Chapu to reinterpret the tradition. He chose instead for the final monument a more romantic pose, closer to the attitude of the Duchess on her deathbed, with one hand trailing gracefully beside her body and the other resting on the drapery over her breast, her celebrated long flowing hair tumbling past her shoulder and spilling over the plinth’s inscription. All of this imparts a sense of naturalism as if her image had been captured whilst drifting off to sleep. The only evidence from the Duchess’s peaceful form that she is dead is that she is covered from neck to feet in a rippling shroud placed over her robe. Her status as a member of the French royal family is indicated by the two shields at her feet bearing the Orléans coat of arms surmounted by a ducal coronet. A fashion for ‘sleeping’ female tomb figures had begun in France in the 1860s. Chapu brought it to a successful climax firstly with his monument to the Duchess of Nemours and two years later with the even more moving tomb effigy of her sister-in-law, the 'Duchesse d’Orléans', in the Royal Chapel at Dreux19. The pose of the left hand on the chest and the other resting beside the body became popular and Chapu was requested to provide it for his marble low relief for the tomb of 'Laure Labiche', which he sculpted in 1883 for the cemetery of Béville-le-Comte (Eure-et-Loir)20. With hindsight, the Duke of Nemours’ choice of Chapu to design the monument to his beloved wife was not surprising. Near the end of his life Chapu had become renowned as a funerary sculptor. In fact art critics praised him, saying: “ideally if one wants to leave an immortal trace one should be entombed by Mr. Chapu”21. Chapu was one of the chief French academic sculptors of the second half of the nineteenth century. He had won a number of prizes, spent five years in Italy (1855-1860) as a student, and returned to receive a number of public and private commissions, sculpting figures to decorate Parisian railway stations, universities and department stores. He had finally come to public recognition in 1872 with a celebrated monument to 'Joan of Arc at Domrémy' (Musée d'Orsay, Paris), which portrayed the heroine as a peasant girl at prayer. Chapu’s election to the Académie des Beaux-arts in 1880 crowned his official career. But when in 1881 Chapu was commissioned by the Duke he had yet to sculpt any reclining tomb effigies. The 'Duchess of Nemours' was to be his first and became regarded as among his best22. In the figure of the 'Duchess of Nemours' Chapu created a poignant expression of a life cut short, whose naturalistic and emotional realism provided a focus for her husband’s, her family’s and her royal cousins’ grief. The sculpture was eventually acquired by the Walker Art Gallery in 1994 after the Roman Catholic church authorities decided controversially to sell the tomb effigy and make its church of St. Charles Borromeo redundant. ProvenanceCommissioned by Louis Charles Philippe Raphael, the Duc de Nemours (1814-1896) for a specially built chapel attached to the Roman Catholic church of St. Charles Borromeo, Heath Street, Weybridge, Surrey, and installed in 1883; removed from church in 198923; sold Sotheby’s, London, 9 December 1993, lot 93; acquired by National Museums & Galleries on Merseyside for the Walker Art Gallery in 1994 with a contribution from The Art Fund after an export licence had been temporarily deferred. Literature
Footnotes
|